E. Roets

611 citations
41 papers · 553 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

E. Roets

39 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

E. Roets
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 338
  • Animal Science and Zoology 108
  • Small Animals 61
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 103
  • Microbiology 41
Replace Anna Maria Caroli with:
Anna Maria Caroli Italy
K. Baintner Hungary
R Denamur France
Xianwen Dong China
Nuno da Costa United Kingdom
J. L. Pate United States
Jamie C. Laurenz United States
Juncai Chen China
Jinshan Cao China
M. Shinoda Japan
E. Roets relative to Anna Maria Caroli Italy Anna Maria Caroli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Anna Maria Caroli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Roets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Roets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Roets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Roets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Roets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Roets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Roets. The network helps show where E. Roets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Roets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Roets Line = papers co-authored together E. Roets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199390
2 198356
3 199750
4 197941
5 197230
6 199928
7 197922
8 197219
9 197419
10 199818
11 198317
12 198616
13 199813
14 197913
15 198911
16
Identification of beta-adrenoceptors in bovine teat muscles by 3H-dihydroalprenolol binding.
198411
17
A comparison of the binding characteristics of the alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonists 3H-yohimbine and 3H-rauwolscine in bovine teat muscles.
198610
18 19958
19 19978
20 19958

About E. Roets

E. Roets is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 41 papers that have together received 553 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows (14 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (9 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (6 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (4 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (338 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (108 citations), Small Animals (61 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (103 citations) and Microbiology (41 citations). E. Roets has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. Peeters, Christian Burvenich, Rein Verbeke, A.M. Massart-Leën, E.N. Noordhuizen-Stassen, Roger Heyneman, W.D.J. Kremer, Hilde Dosogne, Bruno Goddeeris and T. van Werven. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Research, Journal of Dairy Science, Veterinary Research Communications, Veterinary Quarterly and Infection and Immunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact