E. Pfister

22 papers receiving 658 citations

Peers

E. Pfister
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Biochemistry 87
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 218
  • Chemical Health and Safety 5
  • Human-Computer Interaction 36
  • Neurology 65
Replace Seung Ho Jung with:
Seung Ho Jung United States
Antonello Fadda Italy
John McLean Australia
Yen-Ting Chen Taiwan
Xiangbin Wang China
Masahiko Yamaguchi Japan
Julian J. Nussbaum United States
Won Suk Lee South Korea
Shiliang Zhang United States
E. Pfister relative to Seung Ho Jung United States Seung Ho Jung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Seung Ho Jung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Pfister

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Pfister's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Pfister with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Pfister more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Pfister

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Pfister. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Pfister. The network helps show where E. Pfister may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Pfister, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Pfister Line = papers co-authored together E. Pfister links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007347
2 2004138
3 200850
4 200234
5 200322
6 200218
7 200312
8 20059
9 19707
10 19687
11 20116
12 19996
13 19966
14 20104
15 20074
16 20094
17
[Neurotoxicity due to long-standing exposure to lead].
20013
18 20092
19 20072
20 19961

About E. Pfister

E. Pfister is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 684 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (3 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (1 paper) and Color Science and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (87 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (218 citations), Chemical Health and Safety (5 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (36 citations) and Neurology (65 citations). E. Pfister has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn Chase, Phillip D. Zamore, Dinah W.Y. Sah, Marian DiFiglia, Jeffrey A. Yoder, Miguel Sena‐Esteves, Neil Aronin, Raj Kumar Pandey, Muthiah Manoharan and Ellen Sapp. Their work appears in journals such as International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Der Ophthalmologe, Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact