E. P. Smith

868 citations
43 papers · 739 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

E. P. Smith

41 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

E. P. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 23
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 670
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 33
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 40
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 1
  • Computational Mechanics 12
Replace Edith Clavel with:
Edith Clavel France
T. Sekigawa Japan
Ian M. Baker United Kingdom
V. Lapras France
Andreas Gerhard Steffan Germany
Yifei Huang China
Edward M. Luong United States
Gerard L. Destefanis France
Yakov Royter United States
Angelo Genovese Austria
E. P. Smith relative to Edith Clavel France Edith Clavel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Edith Clavel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. P. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. P. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. P. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. P. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. P. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. P. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. P. Smith. The network helps show where E. P. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. P. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. P. Smith Line = papers co-authored together E. P. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200465
2 201649
3 201243
4 200638
5 201038
6 200433
7 200329
8 200529
9 199927
10 201127
11 200326
12 200626
13 201224
14 199421
15 199819
16 199818
17 201917
18 200716
19 200315
20 201115

About E. P. Smith

E. P. Smith is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Nuclear Energy and Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 43 papers that have together received 739 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials (39 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (3 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (2 papers), Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis (1 paper), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (1 paper) and History and Developments in Astronomy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (670 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (33 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (40 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (1 citation) and Computational Mechanics (12 citations). E. P. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Scott M. Johnson, L. Faraone, Charles A. Musca, John M. Dell, David R. Rhiger, Gregory M. Venzor, W. A. Radford, Sanjay Krishna, David A. Redfern and Elizabeth A. Patten. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Electronic Materials, The Astronomical Journal, Applied Physics Letters, IEEE Electron Device Letters and Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact