E. Meisel
Impact in
- Physiology top 2%
- Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
- Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
- Clinical Biochemistry top 2%
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Papers in
-
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 3
-
- Metabolism and Genetic Disorders 7
E. Meisel
29 papers receiving 2.2k citations
E. Meisel's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Physiology 126
- Clinical Biochemistry 148
- Hepatology 137
- Cell Biology 309
- Biochemistry 131
Countries citing papers authored by E. Meisel
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Meisel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Meisel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Meisel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Meisel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Meisel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Meisel. The network helps show where E. Meisel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside E. Meisel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Histochemistry of Hepatic Phosphatases at a Physiologic pH: With Special Reference to the Demonstration of Bile Canaliculi Hit paper breakdown → | 1957 | 1617 |
| 2 | ON THE HISTOCHEMICAL DEMONSTRATION OF GLUCOSE-6-PHOSPHATASE Hit paper breakdown → | 1956 | 339 |
| 3 | 1961 | 101 | |
| 4 | 1960 | 96 | |
| 5 | 1957 | 83 | |
| 6 | 1959 | 53 | |
| 7 | 1955 | 42 | |
| 8 | 1964 | 37 | |
| 9 | 1951 | 34 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 32 | |
| 11 | Enzymatic histochemistry in the experimentally damaged liver. | 1962 | 29 |
| 12 | 1953 | 28 | |
| 13 | 1954 | 24 | |
| 14 | 1951 | 21 | |
| 15 | Substrate specific phosphatases at pH 7.2 in biliary obstruction and liver cell damage; special reference to the bile canaliculi in obstructive jaundice and liver-cell necrosis. | 1958 | 20 |
| 16 | 1954 | 17 | |
| 17 | 1959 | 17 | |
| 18 | Intracellular localization of acid phosphatase as studied in mammalian kidneys. | 1962 | 17 |
| 19 | 1952 | 14 | |
| 20 | Enzymatic Staining Reactions in the Kidneys of Potassium-Depleted Rats. | 1959 | 14 |
About E. Meisel
E. Meisel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Cell Biology, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 31 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (7 papers), Aldose Reductase and Taurine (4 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (2 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (126 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (148 citations), Hepatology (137 citations), Cell Biology (309 citations) and Biochemistry (131 citations). E. Meisel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Wachstein and Suzanne G. Laychock. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, Experimental Biology and Medicine, Science, The Journal of Cell Biology and Biochemical Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.