E. M. Thain
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Biochemistry top 10%
Papers in
-
- Neurological diseases and metabolism 9
- Co-authors
- J. Baddiley (13 shared papers)M Schachter (1 shared paper)M. Snarey (5 shared papers)Paul J. Godin (5 shared papers)R. M. Sawicki (3 shared papers)G. David Novelli (1 shared paper)Fritz Lipmann (1 shared paper)Michael H. Abraham (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nature (6 papers)Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (4 papers)Analytica Chimica Acta (1 paper)Science (1 paper)The Analyst (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
E. M. Thain
30 papers receiving 420 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Insect Science 104
- Biochemistry 58
- Clinical Biochemistry 40
- Neurology 41
- Molecular Biology 253
Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Thain
This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Thain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Thain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Thain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Thain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Thain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Thain. The network helps show where E. M. Thain may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. M. Thain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1953 | 55 | |
| 2 | 1954 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1957 | 48 | |
| 4 | 1962 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1962 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1951 | 26 | |
| 7 | 1966 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1951 | 25 | |
| 9 | THE EXCRETION BY HUMANS OF THE PHENOL DERIVED IN VIVO FROM 2-ISOPROPOXYPHENYL N-METHYLCARBAMATE. | 1964 | 24 |
| 10 | 1952 | 19 | |
| 11 | 1961 | 19 | |
| 12 | 1961 | 19 | |
| 13 | 1963 | 17 | |
| 14 | 1953 | 17 | |
| 15 | 1952 | 17 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 16 | |
| 17 | 1963 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1951 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1952 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1951 | 9 |
About E. M. Thain
E. M. Thain is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Neurology, Organic Chemistry, Clinical Biochemistry and Cell Biology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 543 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological diseases and metabolism (9 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (7 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (6 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (6 papers), Organophosphorus compounds synthesis (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Synthesis and Reactivity of Sulfur-Containing Compounds (3 papers) and Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (104 citations), Biochemistry (58 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (40 citations), Neurology (41 citations) and Molecular Biology (253 citations). E. M. Thain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include J. Baddiley, M Schachter, M. Snarey, Paul J. Godin, R. M. Sawicki, G. David Novelli, Fritz Lipmann, Michael H. Abraham, D. R. Llewellyn and Alwyn G. Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Analytica Chimica Acta, Science and The Analyst.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.