E. M. Ott

11 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

E. M. Ott
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Endocrinology 76
  • Molecular Medicine 33
  • Clinical Biochemistry 31
  • Water Science and Technology 66
  • Food Science 82
Replace Amine M. Boukerb with:
Amine M. Boukerb France
Hidemasa Kodaka Japan
Cinzia Benagli Switzerland
Renlin Xu Canada
Alfred PÃ ⁄ hler Germany
Marina P. Volegova United States
Susanne Schneiker-Bekel Germany
Teik-Min Chong Malaysia
Dominika Drzewiecka Poland
Azuka Iwobi Germany
E. M. Ott relative to Amine M. Boukerb France Amine M. Boukerb's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Amine M. Boukerb · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. M. Ott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. M. Ott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. M. Ott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. M. Ott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. M. Ott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. M. Ott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. M. Ott. The network helps show where E. M. Ott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. M. Ott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. M. Ott Line = papers co-authored together E. M. Ott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2001148
2 201180
3 201366
4 201460
5 200157
6 201226
7 20064
8 20234
9
Ensiling remoistened legume seeds and influence of conservation on contents of alkaloids, oligosaccharides, phytate-phosphorus and tannins.
20133
10
Performance of lactating dairy cows fed raw or expanded lupin seed.
20062
11 20051

About E. M. Ott

E. M. Ott is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Agronomy and Crop Science and Plant Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urinary Tract Infections Management (2 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (2 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (1 paper), Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (1 paper), DNA Repair Mechanisms (1 paper), Agricultural pest management studies (1 paper), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (1 paper) and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (76 citations), Molecular Medicine (33 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (31 citations), Water Science and Technology (66 citations) and Food Science (82 citations). E. M. Ott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Müller, Marina E. H. Müller, Andreas Ulrich, Matthew A. Mulvey, Charles B. Jones, Virginie Sandrin, Markus Babst, Matthew G. Blango, Andreja Erman and Peter Veranič. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Microbiology, Infection and Immunity, Traffic, Biochemistry and Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact