E M Brett

2.8k citations
63 papers · 1.9k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

E M Brett

62 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

E M Brett
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Clinical Biochemistry 255
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 353
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 387
  • Neurology 100
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 204
Replace Mårten Kyllerman with:
Mårten Kyllerman Sweden
Marie‐Cécile Nassogne Belgium
Joseph H. French United States
Emilio Franzonı Italy
Dimitrios Zafeiriou Greece
N. Paul Rosman United States
Anatole S. Dekaban United States
Paul Dyken United States
Arthur L. Prensky United States
Patrick F. Bray United States
E M Brett relative to Mårten Kyllerman Sweden Mårten Kyllerman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mårten Kyllerman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E M Brett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E M Brett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E M Brett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E M Brett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E M Brett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E M Brett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E M Brett. The network helps show where E M Brett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E M Brett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E M Brett Line = papers co-authored together E M Brett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992287
2
Pearson syndrome and mitochondrial encephalomyopathy in a patient with a deletion of mtDNA.
1991191
3 1981145
4 197887
5 199167
6 198960
7 198960
8 197357
9 198454
10 198849
11 198345
12 198342
13 196638
14 198238
15 197837
16 198736
17 199231
18 198731
19 198929
20 198327

About E M Brett

E M Brett is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental health, Genetics and Genetics, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (8 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (7 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (7 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (7 papers), Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (6 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (6 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (5 papers) and Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (255 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (353 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (387 citations), Neurology (100 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (204 citations). E M Brett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and India. Frequent co-authors include J. Egger, M Baraitser, Robert Rosenheck, Steven M. Southwick, Brian Lake, J. Douglas Bremner, Alan Fontana, Dennis S. Charney, A. E. Harding and Ian Holt. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Journal of Medical Genetics, Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact