E. J. Young
Impact in
- Small Animals top 0.2%
- Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Escherichia coli research studies
Papers in
-
- Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment 3
- Surgery 2
- Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 1
- Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy 1
- Co-authors
- Rabih O. Darouiche (1 shared paper)Richard L. Harris (1 shared paper)Daniel M. Musher (1 shared paper)Richard J. Hamill (1 shared paper)R E Baughn (1 shared paper)N. S. Galbraith (1 shared paper)Pierce D. Nunley (1 shared paper)Marcus B. Stone (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Infectious Diseases (3 papers)The International Journal of Spine Surgery (1 paper)The Journal of Infectious Diseases (1 paper)Archives of Internal Medicine (1 paper)CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
E. J. Young
7 papers receiving 984 citations
E. J. Young's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Small Animals 836
- Endocrinology 95
- Parasitology 99
- Epidemiology 418
- Food Science 235
Countries citing papers authored by E. J. Young
This map shows the geographic impact of E. J. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. J. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. J. Young more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. J. Young
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. J. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. J. Young. The network helps show where E. J. Young may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside E. J. Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | An Overview of Human Brucellosis Hit paper breakdown → | 1995 | 654 |
| 2 | 1983 | 251 | |
| 3 | 1989 | 81 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1975 | 19 | |
| 6 | 1980 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2025 | 1 |
About E. J. Young
E. J. Young is a scholar working on Small Animals, Surgery, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology and General Health Professions, having authored 7 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Brucella: diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment (3 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (1 paper), Leptospirosis research and findings (1 paper), Public Health Policies and Education (1 paper), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (1 paper), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (1 paper), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (1 paper) and Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (836 citations), Endocrinology (95 citations), Parasitology (99 citations), Epidemiology (418 citations) and Food Science (235 citations). E. J. Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Rabih O. Darouiche, Richard L. Harris, Daniel M. Musher, Richard J. Hamill, R E Baughn, N. S. Galbraith, Pierce D. Nunley and Marcus B. Stone. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Infectious Diseases, The International Journal of Spine Surgery, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Archives of Internal Medicine and CrossRef Listing of Deleted DOIs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.