E. Ide Smith
Impact in
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
- Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
- Gastroenterology top 2%
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Papers in
- Co-authors
- William P. Tunell (17 shared papers)F. Ann Hayes (13 shared papers)R P Castleberry (11 shared papers)Jonathan J. Shuster (9 shared papers)A. Thomas Look (6 shared papers)Laura C. Bowman (4 shared papers)Stephen G. Jolley (7 shared papers)E C Douglass (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Pediatric Surgery (23 papers)Journal of Clinical Oncology (9 papers)Annals of Surgery (6 papers)Cancer (4 papers)The American Journal of Surgery (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
E. Ide Smith
66 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Neurology 1.5k
- Gastroenterology 259
- Cancer Research 325
- Surgery 783
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 331
Countries citing papers authored by E. Ide Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of E. Ide Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Ide Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Ide Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. Ide Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Ide Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Ide Smith. The network helps show where E. Ide Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Ide Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1991 | 476 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 152 | |
| 3 | 1988 | 122 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 116 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 95 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 86 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 84 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 80 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 66 | |
| 10 | Sacrococcygeal teratoma in infants and children. | 1951 | 66 |
| 11 | 1986 | 65 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 62 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 60 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 58 | |
| 15 | 1994 | 49 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 47 | |
| 17 | 1991 | 46 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 46 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 45 | |
| 20 | 1995 | 42 |
About E. Ide Smith
E. Ide Smith is a scholar working on Surgery, Neurology, Epidemiology, Gastroenterology and Molecular Biology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (26 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (8 papers), Intestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders (8 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (7 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (6 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (5 papers) and Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (1.5k citations), Gastroenterology (259 citations), Cancer Research (325 citations), Surgery (783 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (331 citations). E. Ide Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include William P. Tunell, F. Ann Hayes, R P Castleberry, Jonathan J. Shuster, A. Thomas Look, Laura C. Bowman, Stephen G. Jolley, E C Douglass, G M Brodeur and Robert P. Castleberry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Surgery, Cancer and The American Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.