E. G. Straus

88 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

E. G. Straus
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 297
  • Algebra and Number Theory 313
  • Geometry and Topology 505
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 812
  • Numerical Analysis 260
Replace T. S. Motzkin with:
T. S. Motzkin United States
Morris Newman United States
L. Mirsky United Kingdom
Igor R. Shafarevich Russia
C. A. Rogers United Kingdom
Wolfgang M. Schmidt United States
William S. Massey United States
Bruno Salvy France
Steven Roman United States
Michael F. Singer United States
E. G. Straus relative to T. S. Motzkin United States T. S. Motzkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
T. S. Motzkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. G. Straus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. G. Straus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. G. Straus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. G. Straus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. G. Straus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. G. Straus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. G. Straus. The network helps show where E. G. Straus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. G. Straus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. G. Straus Line = papers co-authored together E. G. Straus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1965436
2 197789
3 195584
4 195178
5 197362
6 196052
7 196245
8 196041
9 196441
10 197441
11 197938
12 197936
13 197135
14 196534
15 197434
16 196233
17 197132
18 195832
19 197330
20 195330

About E. G. Straus

E. G. Straus is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 101 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (10 papers), Meromorphic and Entire Functions (10 papers), Mathematics and Applications (9 papers), advanced mathematical theories (8 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (8 papers), Advanced Mathematical Identities (7 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (7 papers) and Analytic Number Theory Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (297 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (313 citations), Geometry and Topology (505 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (812 citations) and Numerical Analysis (260 citations). E. G. Straus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include T. S. Motzkin, Moshe Goldberg, P. Erdös, George E. Forsythe, Paul J. Kelly, Paul Erdős, Herbert Busemann, R. M. Redheffer, Keith M. Rogers and William W. Adams. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Journal of Mathematics, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Linear Algebra and its Applications, Acta Arithmetica and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact