E. Díaz‐León

507 citations
16 papers · 182 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

E. Díaz‐León

16 papers receiving 167 citations

Peers

E. Díaz‐León
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 54
  • Philosophy 88
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 66
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 37
  • Sociology and Political Science 81
Replace Ásta Kristjana Sveinsdóttir with:
Ásta Kristjana Sveinsdóttir United States
Alice Crary United States
David Chalmers United States
Editors Grazer Philosophische studien
Mari Mikkola Germany
Sebastian Gardner United Kingdom
Matthieu Queloz Switzerland
David Kovacs United States
Sally Sedgwick United States
Michaël Moriarty United States
E. Díaz‐León relative to Ásta Kristjana Sveinsdóttir United States Ásta Kristjana Sveinsdóttir's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Ásta Kristjana Sveinsdóttir · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Díaz‐León

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Díaz‐León's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Díaz‐León with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Díaz‐León more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Díaz‐León

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Díaz‐León. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Díaz‐León. The network helps show where E. Díaz‐León may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside E. Díaz‐León, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Díaz‐León Line = papers co-authored together E. Díaz‐León links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201346
2 201633
3 201316
4 201014
5 201011
6 200811
7 20159
8 20188
9 20177
10
Feminist Philosophy of Language
20047
11 20175
12
Social Kinds, Conceptual Analysis, and the Operative Concept: A Reply to Haslanger
20124
13 20164
14 20193
15
The Meta-Problem of Consciousness and the Phenomenal Concept Strategy
20202
16 20212

About E. Díaz‐León

E. Díaz‐León is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 182 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (5 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (1 paper) and Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (54 citations), Philosophy (88 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (66 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (37 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (81 citations). E. Díaz‐León has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer Saul. Their work appears in journals such as Ratio, Philosophical Studies, Disputatio, European Journal of Philosophy and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact