E. Coen

594 citations
26 papers · 516 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

E. Coen

25 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

E. Coen
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 144
  • Cell Biology 64
  • Microbiology 27
  • Spectroscopy 60
  • Virology 15
Replace Alois Hodel with:
Alois Hodel United Kingdom
Daniel Beacham United States
Yoh-ichi Satoh Japan
James B. Rouse United States
Austen E. Spruce United Kingdom
Kyu Young Song United States
Xiaojie Yang China
Jean S. Gale United Kingdom
Rosa Vaccaro Italy
Cecilia Castillo Venezuela
E. Coen relative to Alois Hodel United Kingdom Alois Hodel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.5×
Alois Hodel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Coen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Coen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Coen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Coen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Coen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Coen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Coen. The network helps show where E. Coen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Coen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Coen Line = papers co-authored together E. Coen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200987
2 198751
3 201446
4 199741
5 198839
6 199532
7 200830
8 197928
9 201422
10 199821
11 199518
12 198417
13 198215
14 198312
15 199510
16 19899
17 19929
18 20027
19 19996
20 19975

About E. Coen

E. Coen is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cell Biology and Genetics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (4 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (3 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (2 papers) and Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (144 citations), Cell Biology (64 citations), Microbiology (27 citations), Spectroscopy (60 citations) and Virology (15 citations). E. Coen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Werner P. De Potter, Xaveer Van Ostade, Wiebren A.A. Tjalma, Tony J. Verbeuren, Geert Van Raemdonck, Aniek A. Schoups, Paul M. Vanhoutte, Lieve Dillen, Christophe Depuydt and Isabel Llona. Their work appears in journals such as Regulatory Peptides, Brain Research, Hypertension, Developmental Brain Research and Clinical Otolaryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact