E. Chanut

490 citations
16 papers · 437 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

E. Chanut

16 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

E. Chanut
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 110
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 177
  • Biological Psychiatry 16
  • Ophthalmology 52
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 14
Replace Peter D. Alfinito with:
Peter D. Alfinito United States
Nicola H. Allen United Kingdom
Thomas N. Thomas United States
Tracey Ashmeade United Kingdom
Otoni Cardoso do Vale Brazil
Barbara Peruche Germany
C Malcolm United Kingdom
David Heron Israel
Kim Y. Avenell United Kingdom
Yoshiaki Hosohata Japan
E. Chanut relative to Peter D. Alfinito United States Peter D. Alfinito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Peter D. Alfinito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Chanut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Chanut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Chanut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Chanut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Chanut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Chanut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Chanut. The network helps show where E. Chanut may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Chanut, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Chanut Line = papers co-authored together E. Chanut links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Retinal TUNEL-positive cells and high glutamate levels in vitreous humor of mutant quail with a glaucoma-like disorder.
199983
2 199670
3 199855
4 199352
5 199446
6 200828
7 200228
8
Changes in retinal dopaminergic cells and dopamine rhythmic metabolism during the development of a glaucoma-like disorder in quails.
199622
9 200216
10 199210
11 199310
12 19968
13 20065
14 19912
15 20091
16 19921

About E. Chanut

E. Chanut is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pharmacology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (110 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (177 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations), Ophthalmology (52 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (14 citations). E. Chanut has collaborated with scholars based in France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Hugues Trouvin, Claudine Versaux‐Botteri, Jeanine Nguyen‐Legros, C. Jacquot, Alain M. Gardier, J Nguyen-Legros, Francis Minvielle, Axelle Simon, Michèle Savoldelli and Marcin Wąsowicz. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Pharmacology, Brain Research, Journal of Neurochemistry, Life Sciences and Ophthalmic Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact