E. Chanut

490 citations
16 papers · 437 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

E. Chanut

16 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

E. Chanut
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 111
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 205
  • Ophthalmology 70
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 18
Replace Thomas N. Thomas with:
Thomas N. Thomas United States
Karen Benwell United Kingdom
Charles F. Zorumski United States
Yoshiaki Hosohata Japan
Rukhsana Safa United Kingdom
Yvonne C. Clement‐Cormier United States
David Heron Israel
Andrew W. Siu Hong Kong
Kim Y. Avenell United Kingdom
M Dóda Hungary
E. Chanut relative to Thomas N. Thomas United States Thomas N. Thomas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Thomas N. Thomas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. Chanut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. Chanut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Chanut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Chanut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. Chanut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Chanut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Chanut. The network helps show where E. Chanut may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. Chanut, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. Chanut Line = papers co-authored together E. Chanut links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1
Retinal TUNEL-positive cells and high glutamate levels in vitreous humor of mutant quail with a glaucoma-like disorder.
199981
2 199667
3 199854
4 199351
5 199445
6 200827
7 200226
8
Changes in retinal dopaminergic cells and dopamine rhythmic metabolism during the development of a glaucoma-like disorder in quails.
199622
9 200216
10 199312
11 199210
12 199310
13 19968
14 20065
15 19912
16 19921

About E. Chanut

E. Chanut is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pharmacology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (5 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (2 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (111 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (205 citations), Ophthalmology (70 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (18 citations). E. Chanut has collaborated with scholars based in France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Hugues Trouvin, Claudine Versaux‐Botteri, Jeanine Nguyen‐Legros, C. Jacquot, Alain M. Gardier, Francis Minvielle, J Nguyen-Legros, Axelle Simon, Marcin Wąsowicz and Michèle Savoldelli. Their work appears in journals such as Life Sciences, Brain Research, Biochemical Pharmacology, Journal of Neurochemistry and Appetite.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact