E. C. Lim

4.8k citations
190 papers · 4.2k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

E. C. Lim

187 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

E. C. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 2.5k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.0k
  • Spectroscopy 994
  • Bioengineering 191
  • Biophysics 157
Replace Rudolph Pariser with:
Rudolph Pariser United States
Tadamasa Shida Japan
J. Ladik Germany
Alfred Karpfen Austria
Jaan Laane United States
Erik W. Thulstrup Denmark
S. Califano Italy
Jacek Waluk Poland
Zdeněk Havlas Czechia
Jan Kommandeur Netherlands
E. C. Lim relative to Rudolph Pariser United States Rudolph Pariser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Rudolph Pariser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. C. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. C. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. C. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. C. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. C. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. C. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. C. Lim. The network helps show where E. C. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. C. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. C. Lim Line = papers co-authored together E. C. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 190 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1966114
2 1972104
3 1978104
4 199499
5 198291
6 199590
7 198186
8 197477
9 199472
10 197072
11 198365
12 198264
13 197862
14 196757
15 197054
16 196752
17 196849
18 197649
19 196546
20 196845

About E. C. Lim

E. C. Lim is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Materials Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry, having authored 190 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (120 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (69 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (47 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (26 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (22 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (16 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (13 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (2.5k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.0k citations), Spectroscopy (994 citations), Bioengineering (191 citations) and Biophysics (157 citations). E. C. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Israel. Frequent co-authors include S. Okajima, W. A. Wassam, Asit K. Chandra, Nobuaki Kanamaru, Hiroyuki Saigusa, Gregory D. Gillispie, J.D. Laposa, Swapan Chakrabarti, Hiroyuki Saigusa and Y. Hirata. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemical Physics Letters, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact