Douglas Both

421 citations
17 papers · 365 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography 8
    • Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects 4
    • Protein purification and stability 2

Douglas Both

16 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Douglas Both
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Analytical Chemistry 106
  • Pharmaceutical Science 61
  • Biophysics 57
  • Spectroscopy 65
  • Biomedical Engineering 104
Replace Johannes J. Moes with:
Johannes J. Moes Netherlands
Vu Dang Hoang Vietnam
Shuichi Yada Japan
Lucia Rus Romania
Maxwell Korang‐Yeboah United States
Kaisa Naelapää Denmark
William E. Bowen United States
Kati Pöllänen Finland
Tineke Vankeirsbilck Belgium
Lauranne Netchacovitch Belgium
Douglas Both relative to Johannes J. Moes Netherlands Johannes J. Moes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Johannes J. Moes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Both

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Both's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Both with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Both more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Both

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Both. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Both. The network helps show where Douglas Both may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Both, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Both Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Both links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 200686
2 201172
3 200543
4 202032
5 201429
6 201524
7 198718
8 201616
9 202114
10 20227
11 19916
12 20185
13 19925
14 20093
15 20242
16 19912
17 19831

About Douglas Both

Douglas Both is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Molecular Biology, Analytical Chemistry, Biophysics and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 17 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers), Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (5 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (5 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (4 papers), Crystallization and Solubility Studies (3 papers), Protein purification and stability (2 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (2 papers) and Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (106 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (61 citations), Biophysics (57 citations), Spectroscopy (65 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (104 citations). Douglas Both has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Claudia C. Corredor, Edward J. Delaney, A. Erik Rubin, Srinivas Tummala, Mohammed Jemal, Frank Rinaldi, Wayne E. Sinclair, D. Desai, Graham S. Clarke and John W. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Journal of Mass Spectrometry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact