Doris Lechner

4.8k citations
13 papers · 608 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

    • Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways 1
    • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock 2
    • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals 2

Doris Lechner

13 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers

Doris Lechner
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Molecular Medicine 39
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 45
  • Pharmacology 58
  • Food Science 113
  • Biochemistry 31
Replace Haibo Feng with:
Haibo Feng China
Gang Ye China
Yasukazu Nakakita Japan
Cátia Ramalhete Portugal
Islam Mostafa Egypt
Stanley Juan Chavéz Gutierrez Brazil
Claudia Timpel Germany
Paloma Lys de Medeiros Brazil
Masahiko Ito Japan
Karine R. Begnini Brazil
Doris Lechner relative to Haibo Feng China Haibo Feng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Haibo Feng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Doris Lechner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Doris Lechner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Doris Lechner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Doris Lechner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Doris Lechner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Doris Lechner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Doris Lechner. The network helps show where Doris Lechner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Doris Lechner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Doris Lechner Line = papers co-authored together Doris Lechner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2008148
2 2004143
3 201464
4 200852
5 200446
6 200846
7 200432
8 200232
9 200725
10 201610
11 19866
12 20132
13 20052

About Doris Lechner

Doris Lechner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pharmacology, Plant Science and Cancer Research, having authored 13 papers that have together received 608 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (2 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (2 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (1 paper), Quinazolinone synthesis and applications (1 paper), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (1 paper) and Plant chemical constituents analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (39 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (45 citations), Pharmacology (58 citations), Food Science (113 citations) and Biochemistry (31 citations). Doris Lechner has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Simon Gibbons, Franz Bučar, Michael Stavri, Rogelio Pereda‐Miranda, Marta Gut, G.M. Lathrop, Diana Zélénika, Mark Lathrop, Sébastien Gard and Tom Druet. Their work appears in journals such as Phytotherapy Research, Cytogenetic and Genome Research, Phytochemistry Letters, Phytochemistry and Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact