Donna T. Chen

44 papers receiving 956 citations

Peers

Donna T. Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 488
  • General Health Professions 170
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 109
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 80
  • Family Practice 9
Replace Diane Kunyk with:
Diane Kunyk Canada
Emily Jones United States
Mady Chalk United States
Daniel Z. Buchman Canada
Diane S. Morse United States
Stephen G. Henry United States
Marlene Stenbacka Sweden
Christian Haasen Germany
Brian Chan United States
Tim Millar United Kingdom
Donna T. Chen relative to Diane Kunyk Canada Diane Kunyk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Diane Kunyk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donna T. Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donna T. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donna T. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donna T. Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donna T. Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donna T. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donna T. Chen. The network helps show where Donna T. Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donna T. Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Donna T. Chen Line = papers co-authored together Donna T. Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016230
2 1999124
3 200585
4 201777
5 200962
6 200347
7
Ethics of clinical research within a community-academic partnered participatory framework.
200638
8 201736
9 201934
10 200125
11 200325
12 201524
13 201721
14 200219
15 200317
16 200215
17 200812
18 200712
19 201311
20 20199

About Donna T. Chen

Donna T. Chen is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Physiology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (16 papers), Ethics in medical practice (11 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (6 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (4 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (3 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (488 citations), General Health Professions (170 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (109 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (80 citations) and Family Practice (9 citations). Donna T. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Louis Vachon, Bruce Dembling, Michael Gordon, Charles P. O’Brien, Franklin G. Miller, Donald L. Rosenstein, Joshua D. Lee, Peter D. Friedmann, Tamara Y. Boney and Edward V. Nunes. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Stroke, Medical Education and Psychiatric Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact