Donna Feir

652 citations
38 papers · 287 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Health top 10%
    • Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Demography top 10%
    • Culture, Economy, and Development Studies

Papers in

Donna Feir

33 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Donna Feir
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Health 68
  • Demography 49
  • Statistics and Probability 28
  • Economics and Econometrics 88
  • Sociology and Political Science 114
Replace Marcus Böhme with:
Marcus Böhme Germany
Jason Long United States
Alessio Fusco Luxembourg
Brantly Callaway United States
Indranil Dutta United Kingdom
François Gérard United States
Juan Miguel Villa United Kingdom
Margherita Comola France
Gastón Yalonetzky United Kingdom
Nicolai Suppa Spain
Donna Feir relative to Marcus Böhme Germany Marcus Böhme's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Marcus Böhme · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donna Feir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donna Feir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donna Feir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donna Feir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donna Feir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donna Feir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donna Feir. The network helps show where Donna Feir may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Donna Feir, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Donna Feir Line = papers co-authored together Donna Feir links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201642
2 201536
3 202228
4 201621
5 201320
6 201915
7 202310
8 202110
9 202110
10 20209
11 20168
12 20187
13 20206
14 20216
15 20226
16 20226
17 20195
18 20245
19 20224
20 20224

About Donna Feir

Donna Feir is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Health and Accounting, having authored 38 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (9 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), Taxation and Compliance Studies (4 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (4 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (68 citations), Demography (49 citations), Statistics and Probability (28 citations), Economics and Econometrics (88 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (114 citations). Donna Feir has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Lemieux, Vadim Marmer, Randall Akee, Angela Redish, Ann M. Carlos, M. Christopher Auld, Rachel L. Wellhausen, Samuel Mann, Bryan Leonard and Christian Dippel. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique, Canadian Public Policy, International Indigenous Policy Journal, The Journal of Economic History and Public Choice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact