Donna Chung

61 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Donna Chung
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Health 510
  • Gender Studies 209
  • Public Administration 58
  • Clinical Psychology 249
  • General Health Professions 287
Replace Scott D. Easton with:
Scott D. Easton United States
Nancy P. Kropf United States
William M. Holmes United States
Jane A. Rafferty United States
Dawne M. Mouzon United States
Dina J. Wilke United States
Carole Cox United States
Bridget Penhale United Kingdom
Judith G. Gonyea United States
Susan L. Parish United States
Donna Chung relative to Scott D. Easton United States Scott D. Easton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Scott D. Easton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Donna Chung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Donna Chung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donna Chung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donna Chung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Donna Chung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donna Chung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donna Chung. The network helps show where Donna Chung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Donna Chung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Donna Chung Line = papers co-authored together Donna Chung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998172
2 2018167
3 201788
4 200587
5 200984
6 200764
7 201150
8 201934
9 202029
10
The Use of Information and Communication Technologies to Coerce and Control in Domestic Violence and Following Separation
200929
11 201621
12 201021
13 201421
14 200518
15 201517
16 201915
17
Sexual violence offenders: Prevention and intervention approaches
200614
18
Reshaping Responses to Domestic Violence: Final Report
200013
19 201811
20 202011

About Donna Chung

Donna Chung is a scholar working on Health, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (33 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (7 papers), Sex work and related issues (6 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (6 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (4 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (510 citations), Gender Studies (209 citations), Public Administration (58 citations), Clinical Psychology (249 citations) and General Health Professions (287 citations). Donna Chung has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Ed Carson, Jan Breckenridge, Judy L. Postmus, Nicola Sharp-Jeffs, Gretchen L. Hoge, Carole Zufferey, Patrick O’Leary, Reinie Cordier, Andrew Day and Renée Speyer. Their work appears in journals such as Trauma Violence & Abuse, Violence Against Women, Affilia, PLoS ONE and Australian Journal of Social Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact