Don Fallis
Impact in
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Communication top 1%
- Social Media and Politics
Papers in
- Philosophy 46
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 45
-
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 18
- Co-authors
- Martin Frické (5 shared papers)Kay Mathiesen (7 shared papers)Andreas Stokke (1 shared paper)Peter J. Lewis (7 shared papers)Dennis Whitcomb (1 shared paper)M.P. Fricke (1 shared paper)Matthew S. Bedke (1 shared paper)John L. Pollock (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Social Epistemology (4 papers)Synthese (4 papers)Episteme (3 papers)Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoIreland
In The Last Decade
Don Fallis
79 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Don Fallis's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
- Philosophy 664
- Communication 388
- Library and Information Sciences 55
- Theoretical Computer Science 37
- Social Psychology 495
Countries citing papers authored by Don Fallis
This map shows the geographic impact of Don Fallis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Don Fallis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Don Fallis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Don Fallis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Don Fallis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Don Fallis. The network helps show where Don Fallis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Don Fallis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 83 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | What Is Disinformation? Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 311 |
| 2 | 2009 | 149 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 137 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 122 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 113 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 74 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 66 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 65 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 61 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 55 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 55 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 51 | |
| 14 | A Conceptual Analysis of Disinformation | 2009 | 51 |
| 15 | 2013 | 48 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 45 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 18 | On Verifying the Accuracy of Information: Philosophical Perspectives | 2003 | 42 |
| 19 | 1997 | 41 | |
| 20 | 2011 | 38 |
About Don Fallis
Don Fallis is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 83 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (45 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (18 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (14 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (13 papers), Free Will and Agency (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (5 papers) and Spam and Phishing Detection (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (664 citations), Communication (388 citations), Library and Information Sciences (55 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (37 citations) and Social Psychology (495 citations). Don Fallis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Martin Frické, Kay Mathiesen, Andreas Stokke, Peter J. Lewis, Dennis Whitcomb, M.P. Fricke, Matthew S. Bedke, John L. Pollock, Jenann Ismael and Nathan Ballantyne. Their work appears in journals such as Social Epistemology, Synthese, Episteme, Philosophical Studies and Australasian Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.