Dirk Werth

142 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Dirk Werth
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Management Information Systems 467
  • Marketing 183
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 148
  • Human-Computer Interaction 107
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 190
Replace Mikael Lind with:
Mikael Lind Sweden
Frederik Möller Germany
V. Vaishnavi India
Gerhard Satzger Germany
Sobah Abbas Petersen Norway
Michael Fellmann Germany
Aline Dresch Brazil
Jānis Stirna Sweden
Rüdiger Zarnekow Germany
Rossi Sweden
Dirk Werth relative to Mikael Lind Sweden Mikael Lind's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Mikael Lind · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dirk Werth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dirk Werth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dirk Werth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dirk Werth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dirk Werth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dirk Werth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dirk Werth. The network helps show where Dirk Werth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dirk Werth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dirk Werth Line = papers co-authored together Dirk Werth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 168 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
ANALYZING THE BUSINESS MODEL CONCEPT — A COMPREHENSIVE CLASSIFICATION OF LITERATURE
2011116
2 201687
3 202282
4 201564
5 201449
6 201547
7 201043
8 201639
9 201435
10 201728
11 201424
12 201220
13 201219
14 201919
15 201818
16 202215
17 200714
18 201214
19 201713
20 201713

About Dirk Werth

Dirk Werth is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 168 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (57 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (36 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (12 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (11 papers), Digital Innovation in Industries (11 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (11 papers), Collaboration in agile enterprises (9 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (467 citations), Marketing (183 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (148 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (107 citations) and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (190 citations). Dirk Werth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Loos, Julian Krumeich, Stefan Morana, Alexander Maedche, Shubham Jain, Nijat Mehdiyev, August‐Wilhelm Scheer, Benjamin L. Weis, Christoph Mayr‐Dorn and Schahram Dustdar. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Business & Information Systems Engineering, Lecture notes in computer science, Lecture notes in business information processing and Business Process Management Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact