Dinh Hung Mac
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques
- Chemical Synthesis and Reactions
- Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Toxicology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques 15
- Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds 7
- Synthesis and biological activity 6
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 4
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 4
- Synthesis and Biological Evaluation 4
- Co-authors
- Thanh Bình Nguyễn (15 shared papers)Pascal Retailleau (11 shared papers)René Grée (5 shared papers)Thuc‐Huy Duong (6 shared papers)S. Chandrasekhar (4 shared papers)Pierre Le Pogam (4 shared papers)Stéphanie Legoupy (1 shared paper)Jürgen Vitz (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Dinh Hung Mac
36 papers receiving 423 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Organic Chemistry 254
- Toxicology 20
- Catalysis 30
- Process Chemistry and Technology 10
- Pharmacology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Dinh Hung Mac
This map shows the geographic impact of Dinh Hung Mac's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dinh Hung Mac with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dinh Hung Mac more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dinh Hung Mac
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dinh Hung Mac. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dinh Hung Mac. The network helps show where Dinh Hung Mac may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dinh Hung Mac, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 9 |
About Dinh Hung Mac
Dinh Hung Mac is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Pharmacology and Catalysis, having authored 40 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sulfur-Based Synthesis Techniques (15 papers), Synthesis of heterocyclic compounds (7 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (6 papers), Synthesis of Organic Compounds (4 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (4 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (4 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (254 citations), Toxicology (20 citations), Catalysis (30 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (10 citations) and Pharmacology (48 citations). Dinh Hung Mac has collaborated with scholars based in Vietnam, France and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Thanh Bình Nguyễn, Pascal Retailleau, René Grée, Thuc‐Huy Duong, S. Chandrasekhar, Pierre Le Pogam, Stéphanie Legoupy, Jürgen Vitz, Warinthorn Chavasiri and Huu‐Hung Nguyen. Their work appears in journals such as Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, European Journal of Organic Chemistry, Organic Letters and Tetrahedron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.