Lynn Chenoweth

55 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Lynn Chenoweth
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Research and Theory 65
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 60
  • General Health Professions 949
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 37
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 110
Replace Kirsten Corazzini with:
Kirsten Corazzini United States
Kathleen Krichbaum United States
Cheryl Dellasega United States
Gunilla Borglin Sweden
Yvonne K. Scherer United States
Jane Stein‐Parbury Australia
Norma J. Stewart Canada
Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani Japan
Joanne Fitzpatrick United Kingdom
Susan C. Reinhard United States
Lynn Chenoweth relative to Kirsten Corazzini United States Kirsten Corazzini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Kirsten Corazzini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lynn Chenoweth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lynn Chenoweth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lynn Chenoweth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lynn Chenoweth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lynn Chenoweth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lynn Chenoweth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lynn Chenoweth. The network helps show where Lynn Chenoweth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Lynn Chenoweth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lynn Chenoweth Line = papers co-authored together Lynn Chenoweth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201198
2 200995
3 201383
4 200870
5 201262
6 201057
7 201554
8 201050
9 199845
10 199845
11 201344
12 200541
13 201539
14 201539
15 201639
16 201638
17 200237
18 200634
19 200333
20 200733

About Lynn Chenoweth

Lynn Chenoweth is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Psychiatry and Mental health, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (25 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (8 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (65 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (60 citations), General Health Professions (949 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (37 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (110 citations). Lynn Chenoweth has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Yun‐Hee Jeon, Jane Stein‐Parbury, Henry Brodaty, Margaret Fry, Robyn Gallagher, Glenn Arendts, Judith Donoghue, Esther Chang, Karen Hancock and Marion Haas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, Australasian Journal on Ageing, International Journal of Nursing Practice, Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia and International Psychogeriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact