Dimiter Prodanov

55 papers receiving 901 citations

Peers

Dimiter Prodanov
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 387
  • Modeling and Simulation 76
  • Biophysics 80
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 145
  • Biomedical Engineering 278
Replace Marja‐Leena Linne with:
Marja‐Leena Linne Finland
Christopher P. Fall United States
Jan Hrabě United States
Fidel Santamarı́a United States
Daniel J. Tward United States
Alexander O. Tarakanov Russia
Mehmet N. Oguztöreli Canada
Jorge Riera United States
Jonathan R. Silva United States
Dušan Ristanović Serbia
Dimiter Prodanov relative to Marja‐Leena Linne Finland Marja‐Leena Linne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Marja‐Leena Linne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dimiter Prodanov

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dimiter Prodanov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dimiter Prodanov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dimiter Prodanov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dimiter Prodanov

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dimiter Prodanov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dimiter Prodanov. The network helps show where Dimiter Prodanov may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dimiter Prodanov, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dimiter Prodanov Line = papers co-authored together Dimiter Prodanov links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016116
2 201090
3 201377
4 201466
5 201764
6 201250
7 200533
8 200733
9 201932
10 200630
11 201829
12 199924
13 201723
14 200519
15 200019
16 202119
17 200318
18 200916
19 201816
20 199815

About Dimiter Prodanov

Dimiter Prodanov is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering, Applied Mathematics and Biophysics, having authored 61 papers that have together received 931 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fractional Differential Equations Solutions (15 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers), Cell Image Analysis Techniques (8 papers), Iterative Methods for Nonlinear Equations (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Statistical Mechanics and Entropy (5 papers), Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (4 papers) and Image Processing Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (387 citations), Modeling and Simulation (76 citations), Biophysics (80 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (145 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (278 citations). Dimiter Prodanov has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Bulgaria and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jean Delbeke, Dries Braeken, Enrico Marani, Carmen Bartic, H.K.P. Feirabend, Jean Schoenen, Sylvie Multon, Annette Gärtner, Volodymyr B. Bogdanov and Carlos G. Dotti. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, Chaos Solitons & Fractals, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis and IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact