Stanley Rush

2.6k citations
35 papers · 2.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Stanley Rush

32 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Stanley Rush
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 625
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 606
  • Neurology 226
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 318
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 288
Replace Hartmut Dickhaus with:
Hartmut Dickhaus Germany
Thom F. Oostendorp Netherlands
Jaakko Malmivuo Finland
M. Eiselt Germany
A. van Oosterom Netherlands
Reinhard Grebe France
Robert Plonsey United States
Р. Р. Алиев Russia
Geertjan Huiskamp Netherlands
Socrates Dokos Australia
Stanley Rush relative to Hartmut Dickhaus Germany Hartmut Dickhaus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.7×
Hartmut Dickhaus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stanley Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stanley Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stanley Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanley Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stanley Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stanley Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stanley Rush. The network helps show where Stanley Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Stanley Rush, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stanley Rush Line = papers co-authored together Stanley Rush links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1968426
2 1969381
3 1963378
4 1978343
5
Current density in bilateral and unilateral ECT.
197685
6 196856
7 196255
8 196850
9 198742
10 197041
11 198838
12 197537
13 196932
14 196728
15 196626
16 196719
17 195916
18 197416
19 197115
20 197114

About Stanley Rush

Stanley Rush is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include ECG Monitoring and Analysis (9 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (625 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (606 citations), Neurology (226 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (318 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (288 citations). Stanley Rush has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Daniel A. Driscoll, Richard McFee, J.A. Abildskov, Lelon A. Weaver, E. Lepeschkin, Larry D. Haugh, Ian A. F. Stokes, Mary Moffroid, A. H. Turner and R. Weggel. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, American Heart Journal, Advances in cardiology, Spine and Circulation Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact