Didier Clément

48 papers receiving 727 citations

Peers

Didier Clément
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Horticulture 602
  • Food Science 341
  • Plant Science 288
  • Forestry 28
  • Ecology 79
Replace Jeanne A.K. N’Goran with:
Jeanne A.K. N’Goran France
Daniel Bieysse France
Marie-Henriette Flament France
M. F. Duval France
A.F. Krivanek United States
H. Toxopeus Netherlands
C. I. Aguilar‐Vildoso Brazil
Jaime Martínez‐Castillo Mexico
O Daïnou France
W. P. Bemis United States
Didier Clément relative to Jeanne A.K. N’Goran France Jeanne A.K. N’Goran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Jeanne A.K. N’Goran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Didier Clément

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Didier Clément's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Didier Clément with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Didier Clément more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Didier Clément

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Didier Clément. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Didier Clément. The network helps show where Didier Clément may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Didier Clément, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Didier Clément Line = papers co-authored together Didier Clément links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200492
2 200984
3 199581
4 201167
5 201140
6 200335
7 200332
8 200132
9
Nouvelles données sur le fonctionnement du système d'incompatibilité du cacaoyer et ses conséquences pour la sélection
198722
10 200120
11 198920
12 201018
13 201618
14 202016
15 200915
16 200413
17 201713
18 201413
19 199311
20
Etude de la pourriture brune des cabosses du cacaoyer au Cameroun : définition de nouvelles méthodes de lutte
198810

About Didier Clément

Didier Clément is a scholar working on Horticulture, Food Science, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (44 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (21 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (11 papers), Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (10 papers), Oil Palm Production and Sustainability (5 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (4 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (3 papers) and African Botany and Ecology Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (602 citations), Food Science (341 citations), Plant Science (288 citations), Forestry (28 citations) and Ecology (79 citations). Didier Clément has collaborated with scholars based in France, Brazil and Ivory Coast. Frequent co-authors include Claire Lanaud, Jeanne A.K. N’Goran, A. M. Risterucci, Karina Peres Gramacho, Olivier Fouet, Uilson Vanderlei Lopes, Xavier Argout, José Luís Pires, Denis Despréaux and Marie-Henriette Flament. Their work appears in journals such as Tree Genetics & Genomes, Genome, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology and Molecular Breeding.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact