Diane Fraser

1.2k citations
50 papers · 851 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Diane Fraser

48 papers receiving 779 citations

Peers

Diane Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Research and Theory 109
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 166
  • Emergency Medical Services 83
  • General Health Professions 220
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 149
Replace Alice Kiger with:
Alice Kiger United Kingdom
Billie Hunter United Kingdom
Jill Downie Australia
Mavis Kirkham United Kingdom
Víctor M. González‐Chordá Spain
Lois McKellar Australia
Rosemary Mander United Kingdom
Ingela Berggren Sweden
Adele Baldwin Australia
Lyn Ebert Australia
Diane Fraser relative to Alice Kiger United Kingdom Alice Kiger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Alice Kiger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diane Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Fraser. The network helps show where Diane Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Diane Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Diane Fraser Line = papers co-authored together Diane Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199960
2 201055
3 200752
4 201150
5 200050
6 200342
7 201140
8 199440
9 200337
10 201235
11 201434
12 199728
13 200428
14 200719
15 200017
16 199516
17
Exploring how practitioners support and protect adults at risk of harm in the light of the Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007
201116
18 200715
19 201215
20 201214

About Diane Fraser

Diane Fraser is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Research and Theory, having authored 50 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (11 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (9 papers), Nursing education and management (7 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (5 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (5 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (4 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (109 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (166 citations), Emergency Medical Services (83 citations), General Health Professions (220 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (149 citations). Diane Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anita J. Hughes, Roger Murphy, Maggie Mallik, Ian Symonds, Mark Avis, Michelle Butler, Rachael Spencer, David James, Alison Pilnick and Heather Skirton. Their work appears in journals such as Midwifery, Nurse Education Today, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Medical Teacher and Birth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact