Devan L. Puhl

410 citations
15 papers · 324 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Devan L. Puhl

14 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers

Devan L. Puhl
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Biomaterials 170
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 117
  • Developmental Neuroscience 26
  • Rehabilitation 20
  • Biomedical Engineering 114
Replace Anthony R. D’Amato with:
Anthony R. D’Amato United States
Xiaofang Hu China
Nicholas J. Schaub United States
Noushin Amirpour Iran
Andrew E. Rodda Australia
Narges Mahmoodi Iran
Manasa Nune India
Jared Bushman United States
Sajad Hassanzadeh Iran
Yanjun Guan China
Devan L. Puhl relative to Anthony R. D’Amato United States Anthony R. D’Amato's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anthony R. D’Amato · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Devan L. Puhl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Devan L. Puhl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Devan L. Puhl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Devan L. Puhl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Devan L. Puhl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Devan L. Puhl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Devan L. Puhl. The network helps show where Devan L. Puhl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Devan L. Puhl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Devan L. Puhl Line = papers co-authored together Devan L. Puhl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 201951
2 202039
3 201936
4 202235
5 201829
6 201828
7 202026
8 201924
9 202216
10 201915
11 202013
12 20205
13 20214
14 20223
15 20250

About Devan L. Puhl

Devan L. Puhl is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 15 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (8 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (7 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (4 papers), Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers) and Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (170 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (117 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (26 citations), Rehabilitation (20 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (114 citations). Devan L. Puhl has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Ryan J. Gilbert, Anthony R. D’Amato, Derek W. Nelson, Alexis M. Ziemba, Christopher Johnson, Manoj K. Gottipati, R. Helen Zha, David T. Corr, Edmund F. Palermo and Jed Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Chemical Neuroscience, Journal of Materials Chemistry B, Biomedical Materials, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact