Countries where authors publish in Biomedical Materials
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedical Materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedical Materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedical Materials more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Biomedical Materials
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedical Materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedical Materials.
About Biomedical Materials
The 2.6k papers published in Biomedical Materials in the last decades have received a total of 63.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Biomedical Materials usually cover Biomaterials (611 papers), Molecular Medicine (308 papers), Biomedical Engineering (1.2k papers), Rehabilitation (125 papers) and Surfaces, Coatings and Films (98 papers) specifically the topics of Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (949 papers), Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (303 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (277 papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (267 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (163 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (121 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (107 papers) and Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (95 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedical Materials are Myron Spector, Zhidao Xia, James T. Triffitt, Cato T. Laurencin, Sangamesh Gurappa Kumbar, Fuzhai Cui, Roshan James, Seeram Ramakrishna, Syam Prasad Nukavarapu and Mukesh Doble.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.