Countries where authors publish in Biomedical Materials
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomedical Materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomedical Materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomedical Materials more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Biomedical Materials
This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomedical Materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomedical Materials.
About Biomedical Materials
The 2.5k papers published in Biomedical Materials in the last decades have received a total of 57.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Biomedical Materials usually cover Biomaterials (1.0k papers), Orthodontics (145 papers), Oral Surgery (223 papers), Biomedical Engineering (1.4k papers) and Urology (179 papers) specifically the topics of Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (1.0k papers), Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (585 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (326 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (297 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (208 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (195 papers), Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes (194 papers) and Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (169 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomedical Materials are Zhidao Xia, Myron Spector, James T. Triffitt, Cato T. Laurencin, Sangamesh G. Kumbar, Fuzhai Cui, Roshan James, Jiang Chang, Mukesh Doble and Syam P. Nukavarapu.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.