Derek Barker

442 citations
7 papers · 298 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Derek Barker

6 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

Derek Barker
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 85
  • Strategy and Management 100
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 46
  • Public Administration 11
  • Management Science and Operations Research 39
Replace Samuel Garrett-Jones with:
Samuel Garrett-Jones Australia
Finn Hansson Denmark
Katharine Barker United Kingdom
Risto Harisalo Finland
Max Lawson United Kingdom
Omar Belkhodja United Arab Emirates
Günther Tichy Austria
Christian Defélix France
Renato Dagnino Brazil
John Jewkes United States
Derek Barker relative to Samuel Garrett-Jones Australia Samuel Garrett-Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
Samuel Garrett-Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Derek Barker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Derek Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Derek Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Derek Barker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Derek Barker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Derek Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Derek Barker. The network helps show where Derek Barker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Derek Barker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Derek Barker Line = papers co-authored together Derek Barker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 1995146
2
The Scholarship of Engagement: A Taxonomy of Five Emerging Practices.
2004141
3 20073
4 20073
5 20083
6 19772
7 20070

About Derek Barker

Derek Barker is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 7 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (3 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (1 paper), Critical and Liberation Pedagogy (1 paper), Adult and Continuing Education Topics (1 paper) and Service-Learning and Community Engagement (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (85 citations), Strategy and Management (100 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (46 citations), Public Administration (11 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (39 citations). Derek Barker has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include David J. Smith and Leon de Kock. Their work appears in journals such as English Studies in Africa, Journal of Literary Studies, Scrutiny2, Long Range Planning and The Mariner s Mirror.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact