Leon de Kock

735 citations
49 papers · 382 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Leon de Kock

37 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Leon de Kock
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Literature and Literary Theory 176
  • Anthropology 66
  • Sociology and Political Science 257
  • Linguistics and Language 15
  • Law 29
Replace André Brink with:
André Brink South Africa
Zoë Wicomb United Kingdom
David Attwell United Kingdom
Dennis Walder United Kingdom
Barend J. Toerien
Christopher Looby United States
Colin Nicholson United Kingdom
Meg Samuelson South Africa
Oyekan Owomoyela United States
Harish Trivedi India
Leon de Kock relative to André Brink South Africa André Brink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
André Brink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Leon de Kock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leon de Kock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leon de Kock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leon de Kock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leon de Kock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leon de Kock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leon de Kock. The network helps show where Leon de Kock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Leon de Kock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Leon de Kock Line = papers co-authored together Leon de Kock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Civilising barbarians : missionary narrative and African textual response in nineteenth-century South Africa
199676
2 200156
3 199648
4
Does South African literature still exist? Or : South African literature is dead, long live literature in South Africa
200519
5 200919
6 200616
7 201614
8 200111
9 199210
10 20149
11 20108
12 20087
13 20037
14 20096
15 20146
16
Losing the plot: crime, reality and fiction in Postapartheid writing
20166
17 20036
18
An Impossible History Michael Chapman, Southern African Literatures
19975
19 19935
20 20095

About Leon de Kock

Leon de Kock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, Language and Linguistics and Law, having authored 49 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South African History and Culture (24 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (14 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (9 papers), African history and culture studies (8 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (4 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (4 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (4 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (176 citations), Anthropology (66 citations), Sociology and Political Science (257 citations), Linguistics and Language (15 citations) and Law (29 citations). Leon de Kock has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa and United States. Frequent co-authors include Derek Barker and Michael Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Literary Studies, Scrutiny2, English Academy Review, English Studies in Africa and South African Historical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact