Denise King

480 citations
14 papers · 137 · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
    • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
    • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Papers in

Denise King

13 papers receiving 119 citations

Peers

Denise King
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Health 29
  • Clinical Psychology 43
  • Sociology and Political Science 72
  • General Health Professions 26
  • Museology 3
Replace Charlene Douglas with:
Charlene Douglas United States
Dena T. Smith United States
Sophia Backhaus United Kingdom
Amy Zaharlick United States
Dung Ezekiel Jidong United Kingdom
Margarita María Gómez Gómez Colombia
RE Morgan Slovenia
Francis P Flores Hong Kong
Germán Casas Colombia
Denise King relative to Charlene Douglas United States Charlene Douglas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Charlene Douglas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise King. The network helps show where Denise King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Denise King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise King Line = papers co-authored together Denise King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 200536
2 200322
3 200720
4 200313
5 201412
6 20079
7 20038
8 20185
9
Home Detention with Electronic Monitoring in New Zealand and its Implications for Probation
20024
10 20023
11 20032
12 20082
13
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving.
20081
14 20220

About Denise King

Denise King is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Education and Infectious Diseases, having authored 14 papers that have together received 137 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper), Species Distribution and Climate Change (1 paper), Museums and Cultural Heritage (1 paper) and Science Education and Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (29 citations), Clinical Psychology (43 citations), Sociology and Political Science (72 citations), General Health Professions (26 citations) and Museology (3 citations). Denise King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Anita Gibbs, Carmen Morano, Daniel S. Domin, Kathleen Brown, James M. Chamberlain, Anne M. Jones, Jill M. Baren, Rachel Stanley, Piotr Jasiobedzki and Andrew Ogilvie. Their work appears in journals such as Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, Probation Journal, Social Policy and Administration, Journal of Emergency Nursing and Clinical Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact