Dene Baldwin
Impact in
- Toxicology top 1%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use
Papers in
- Toxicology 10
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 10
-
- Pain Management and Opioid Use 7
- Co-authors
- Michael C. Allen (8 shared papers)Roy Bullingham (7 shared papers)Henry McQuay (5 shared papers)H J McQuay (5 shared papers)Gail Cooper (7 shared papers)Lisa Wilson (7 shared papers)R Andrew Moore (3 shared papers)Andrew Moore (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Analytical Toxicology (5 papers)Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine (5 papers)Forensic Science International (3 papers)British Journal of Anaesthesia (2 papers)Anesthesia & Analgesia (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Dene Baldwin
22 papers receiving 410 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Toxicology 155
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 120
- Medical Terminology 1
- Pharmacology 63
- Spectroscopy 65
Countries citing papers authored by Dene Baldwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Dene Baldwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dene Baldwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dene Baldwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dene Baldwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dene Baldwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dene Baldwin. The network helps show where Dene Baldwin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dene Baldwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1984 | 62 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 33 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1984 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 8 | 1986 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2003 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 20 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1984 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 9 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 9 |
About Dene Baldwin
Dene Baldwin is a scholar working on Toxicology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (10 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (4 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (155 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (120 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation), Pharmacology (63 citations) and Spectroscopy (65 citations). Dene Baldwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Michael C. Allen, Roy Bullingham, Henry McQuay, H J McQuay, Gail Cooper, Lisa Wilson, R Andrew Moore, Andrew Moore, C. W. Hand and Vina Spiehler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, Forensic Science International, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Anesthesia & Analgesia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.