Dena Goodman

1.3k citations
31 papers · 337 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Dena Goodman

22 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers

Dena Goodman
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • History and Philosophy of Science 45
  • Museology 32
  • History 89
  • Anthropology 49
  • Philosophy 55
Replace J. Michael Hayden with:
J. Michael Hayden Canada
Carla Hesse United States
Jack R. Censer United States
Sarah Maza United States
Anne‐Marie Thiesse France
Herman Lebovics United States
Raymond Birn
Kevin L. Cope United States
Franco Venturi
Lauro Martines United States
Dena Goodman relative to J. Michael Hayden Canada J. Michael Hayden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
J. Michael Hayden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dena Goodman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dena Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dena Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dena Goodman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dena Goodman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dena Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dena Goodman. The network helps show where Dena Goodman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Dena Goodman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dena Goodman Line = papers co-authored together Dena Goodman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199582
2 199278
3 199228
4 198925
5 199818
6
Furnishing the Eighteenth Century: What Furniture Can Tell Us About the European and American Past
200613
7 200512
8 19849
9 19919
10 19929
11
Shifting the Boundaries: Transformation of the Languages of Public and Private in the Eighteenth Century
19959
12 19917
13 19887
14 19866
15 20026
16 19893
17 19953
18
Marriage Calculations in the Eighteenth Century: Deconstructing the Love vs. Duty Binary
20052
19 20062
20 20132

About Dena Goodman

Dena Goodman is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Museology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Political History Analysis (11 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (10 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (6 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (4 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Analyses (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Museology (32 citations), History (89 citations), Anthropology (49 citations) and Philosophy (55 citations). Dena Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Marie-France Hilgar, Maurice Cranston, Orest Ranum, Kathryn Norberg, Ramchandra Rao, Vivien Jones, John Brewer, John Christian Laursen, Malcolm Cook and Steven Shapin. Their work appears in journals such as Eighteenth-Century Studies, French Historical Studies, The American Historical Review, History of European Ideas and Representations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact