Debra Mathews

62 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Debra Mathews
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Physiology 232
  • Reproductive Medicine 74
  • Neurology 127
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 145
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 201
Replace Luis G. Carvajal‐Carmona with:
Luis G. Carvajal‐Carmona United States
Jill O. Robinson United States
Sven Bocklandt United States
Andrew Kirby United States
Guido de Wert Netherlands
J. Fernando Arena United States
N.E. Morton United States
Joanna M. Watson United States
Takayuki Fujii Japan
Beverly M. Yashar United States
Debra Mathews relative to Luis G. Carvajal‐Carmona United States Luis G. Carvajal‐Carmona's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.0×
Luis G. Carvajal‐Carmona · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Mathews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Mathews's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Mathews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Mathews more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Mathews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Mathews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Mathews. The network helps show where Debra Mathews may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra Mathews, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra Mathews Line = papers co-authored together Debra Mathews links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001218
2 2009119
3 200991
4 202179
5 200942
6 200538
7 201935
8 201432
9 202128
10 199528
11 201727
12 201525
13 200522
14 201422
15 201120
16 201118
17 202215
18 201515
19 202013
20 200613

About Debra Mathews

Debra Mathews is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Genetics and General Health Professions, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (17 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (16 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (8 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (8 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (8 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (232 citations), Reproductive Medicine (74 citations), Neurology (127 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (145 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (201 citations). Debra Mathews has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Juli Bollinger, Alan Regenberg, Evan E. Eichler, Aravinda Chakravarti, Minerva M. Carrasquillo, Janet A. Warrington, Nila Shah, Michael E. Zwick, Carl Kashuk and David J. Cutler. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Cell stem cell, Stem Cell Reports, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics and Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact