Debra Kaplan

912 citations
23 papers · 635 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Debra Kaplan

19 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Debra Kaplan
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 287
  • Clinical Psychology 166
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 37
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 94
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 63
Replace A.M. Meijer with:
A.M. Meijer Netherlands
Sally Staton Australia
Megan C. Finsaas United States
Paula Vagos Portugal
Pedro Afonso Portugal
Lisa C. Hayden United States
Noa Gueron‐Sela Israel
Elizabeth B. Robertson United States
Lydia Hohaus Australia
Lydia Gabriela Speyer United Kingdom
Debra Kaplan relative to A.M. Meijer Netherlands A.M. Meijer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
A.M. Meijer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Kaplan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Kaplan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Kaplan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Kaplan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Kaplan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Kaplan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Kaplan. The network helps show where Debra Kaplan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Debra Kaplan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra Kaplan Line = papers co-authored together Debra Kaplan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005385
2 200763
3 201054
4 198036
5 200734
6 199421
7 20128
8 20054
9 20094
10
Improving Social Skills at the Elementary Level through Cooperative Learning and Direct Instruction.
20014
11 20104
12 20114
13 20123
14 20072
15 20122
16 20202
17 20132
18 20122
19 20161
20 20200

About Debra Kaplan

Debra Kaplan is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, Clinical Psychology and Anthropology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (5 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers), Islamic Studies and History (2 papers), European Political History Analysis (1 paper), Central European Literary Studies (1 paper) and Copyright and Intellectual Property (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (287 citations), Clinical Psychology (166 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (37 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (94 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (63 citations). Debra Kaplan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and China. Frequent co-authors include Lianqi Liu, Judith Owens, Xianchen Liu, Brian H. Bornstein, Tim Ayers, Irwin N. Sandler, Richard L. Venezky, E. Michael Foster, Stefany Coxe and Roger E. Millsap. Their work appears in journals such as The Jewish Quarterly Review, AJS Review The Journal of the Association for Jewish Studies, Archiv für Reformationsgeschichte - Archive for Reformation History, Psychosomatic Medicine and Evaluation Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact