Debra Berry

27 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers

Debra Berry
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Emergency Medicine 59
  • Emergency Medical Services 25
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 12
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
Replace Grace Lindsay with:
Grace Lindsay United Kingdom
Melissa D. Zullo United States
Mona Persenius Sweden
Mary Boyde Australia
Kathryn Buchanan Keller United States
Michael T. Weaver United States
Jae Lan Shim South Korea
Cynthia D. Beckett United States
James A. Hughes Australia
K. Rzechula United States
Debra Berry relative to Grace Lindsay United Kingdom Grace Lindsay's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Grace Lindsay · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Berry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Berry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Berry. The network helps show where Debra Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra Berry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra Berry Line = papers co-authored together Debra Berry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202035
2 200434
3 198434
4 202033
5 199727
6 200426
7
A national survey of certified, recertified, and noncertified oncology nurses: comparisons and contrasts.
199922
8 201720
9 202116
10 201816
11 198914
12 201812
13 202110
14 20019
15 20167
16 20217
17 20226
18 20206
19 20204
20 20214

About Debra Berry

Debra Berry is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Physiology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (1 paper), Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems (1 paper) and Blood groups and transfusion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (59 citations), Emergency Medical Services (25 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (12 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations). Debra Berry has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Julie Considine, Maryann Street, Brian Arbogast, Ashley R. Dennison, Giuseppe Garcea, Chris Sutton, Elizabeth Oldland, Evan Newnham, Josh Allen and Pēteris Dārziņš. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Nursing, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Nurse Educator, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Atherosclerosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact