Deborah Schäfer

1.7k citations
19 papers · 602 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Schäfer

19 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

Deborah Schäfer
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 355
  • Soil Science 113
  • Forestry 42
  • Ecological Modeling 38
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 164
Replace Gábor Ónodi with:
Gábor Ónodi Hungary
Anikó Csecserits Hungary
Katalin Szitár Hungary
Xuedong Lang China
Anvar Sanaei China
Juan de Dios Miranda Spain
Wande Liu China
Marie‐Lise Benot France
Michele de Sá Dechoum Brazil
Juliana Silveira dos Santos Brazil
Deborah Schäfer relative to Gábor Ónodi Hungary Gábor Ónodi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Gábor Ónodi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Schäfer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Schäfer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Schäfer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Schäfer. The network helps show where Deborah Schäfer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Schäfer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Schäfer Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Schäfer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2020115
2 201966
3 201960
4 202137
5 201735
6 201834
7 202032
8 201632
9 201930
10 201830
11 201728
12 202128
13 201923
14 201913
15 202112
16 201811
17 20238
18 20187
19 20181

About Deborah Schäfer

Deborah Schäfer is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Soil Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 602 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers), Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (5 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers) and Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (355 citations), Soil Science (113 citations), Forestry (42 citations), Ecological Modeling (38 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (164 citations). Deborah Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Markus Fischer, Daniel Prati, Till Kleinebecker, Norbert Hölzel, Valentin H. Klaus, Steffen Boch, Verena Busch, Peter Schall, Ute Hamer and Carsten F. Dormann. Their work appears in journals such as Ecohydrology, Journal of Ecology, Ecology and Evolution, Journal of Vegetation Science and Ecological Monographs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact