Ute Hamer

51 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Ute Hamer's Hit Papers

How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils? 2008 · 583 citations
5830+6+12Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

Ute Hamer
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Soil Science 2.0k
  • Environmental Chemistry 536
  • Ecology 962
  • Pollution 396
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 344
Replace Mary E. Stromberger with:
Mary E. Stromberger United States
Eduardo de Sá Mendonça Brazil
Barbara Kitzler Austria
Klaus Lorenz United States
Zhaolei Li China
Franz Buegger Germany
Heiner Flessa Germany
Rongxiao Che China
Cyril Girardin France
Timothy A. Doane United States
Ute Hamer relative to Mary E. Stromberger United States Mary E. Stromberger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Mary E. Stromberger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ute Hamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ute Hamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ute Hamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ute Hamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ute Hamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ute Hamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ute Hamer. The network helps show where Ute Hamer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ute Hamer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ute Hamer Line = papers co-authored together Ute Hamer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
How relevant is recalcitrance for the stabilization of organic matter in soils?
Hit paper breakdown →
2008583
2 2004473
3 2004252
4 2012211
5 2005139
6 2015118
7 2002112
8 200897
9 201489
10 200980
11 200950
12 200749
13 201149
14 201845
15 201340
16 201939
17 200738
18 201237
19 201735
20 201834

About Ute Hamer

Ute Hamer is a scholar working on Soil Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Plant Science and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 53 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (39 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (9 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (7 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (5 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers), Clay minerals and soil interactions (4 papers) and Soil erosion and sediment transport (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (2.0k citations), Environmental Chemistry (536 citations), Ecology (962 citations), Pollution (396 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (344 citations). Ute Hamer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Bernd Marschner, Sonja Brodowski, Franz Makeschin, Wulf Amelung, Karin Potthast, Alexander Tischer, Еvgenia Blagodatskaya, Pieter Meiert Grootes, Gerd Gleixner and Lorenz Schwark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Applied Soil Ecology, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, Plant and Soil and The Science of The Total Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact