Deborah Paul

1.6k citations
49 papers · 786 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Paul

42 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

Deborah Paul
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Ecological Modeling 220
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 190
  • Information Systems and Management 43
  • Ecology 141
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 103
Replace Steven L. Peck with:
Steven L. Peck United States
William J. M. Probert United Kingdom
Sherry He United States
Derek Huntley United Kingdom
Dustin Smith United States
Andrew N. Stillman United States
Cara A. Gallagher Germany
Richard A. Howard United States
Joan Garriga Spain
Marie‐Sophie Rohwäder Germany
Deborah Paul relative to Steven L. Peck United States Steven L. Peck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Steven L. Peck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Paul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Paul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Paul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Paul. The network helps show where Deborah Paul may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Paul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Paul Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Paul links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997119
2 201895
3 202184
4 201263
5 202255
6 201553
7 197650
8 201926
9 201123
10 202021
11 200419
12 200318
13 202116
14 200712
15 201912
16 201911
17 202211
18 200310
19 20129
20 20239

About Deborah Paul

Deborah Paul is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Information Systems, Molecular Biology and Ecology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 786 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (17 papers), Research Data Management Practices (11 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (7 papers), Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (6 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (5 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (4 papers) and Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (220 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (190 citations), Information Systems and Management (43 citations), Ecology (141 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (103 citations). Deborah Paul has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gil Nelson, Michael Giudici, Paul M. Hirsch, Austin Mast, Greg Riccardi, Mary C. Walton, Pamela S. Soltis, Lee Belbin, Shelley James and Arthur D. Chapman. Their work appears in journals such as ZooKeys, Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, The American Journal of Cardiology, Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes and BioScience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact