Gil Nelson
Impact in
- Ecological Modeling top 1%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 15
- Ecology 11
- Remote Sensing in Agriculture 5
- Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Shari Ellis (2 shared papers)Pamela S. Soltis (6 shared papers)Deborah Paul (6 shared papers)Elizabeth R. Ellwood (9 shared papers)Katelin D. Pearson (3 shared papers)Shelley James (2 shared papers)Austin Mast (4 shared papers)Jenn Yost (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Applications in Plant Sciences (7 papers)BioScience (5 papers)ZooKeys (2 papers)Trends in Ecology & Evolution (1 paper)American Journal of Botany (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Gil Nelson
24 papers receiving 962 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Ecological Modeling 506
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 321
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 201
- Ecology 252
- Drug Discovery 1
Countries citing papers authored by Gil Nelson
This map shows the geographic impact of Gil Nelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gil Nelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gil Nelson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gil Nelson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gil Nelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gil Nelson. The network helps show where Gil Nelson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gil Nelson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 249 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 185 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 97 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 56 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 56 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1976 | 8 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 20 | 2023 | 4 |
About Gil Nelson
Gil Nelson is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Information Systems, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 993 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (15 papers), Research Data Management Practices (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (5 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (3 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (506 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (321 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (201 citations), Ecology (252 citations) and Drug Discovery (1 citation). Gil Nelson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shari Ellis, Pamela S. Soltis, Deborah Paul, Elizabeth R. Ellwood, Katelin D. Pearson, Shelley James, Austin Mast, Jenn Yost, Charles C. Davis and Charles G. Willis. Their work appears in journals such as Applications in Plant Sciences, BioScience, ZooKeys, Trends in Ecology & Evolution and American Journal of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.