Deborah Koder

28 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Deborah Koder
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 117
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 140
  • Health 37
  • General Health Professions 100
  • Demography 44
Replace Theris A. Touhy with:
Theris A. Touhy United States
Karyn M. Skultety United States
Richard A. Hussian United States
Erlene Rosowsky United States
Emma Wolverson United Kingdom
Mary P. Quayhagen United States
Shirley Hendrix United States
Eric Cerino United States
Darby Morhardt United States
Danielle Moore United Kingdom
Deborah Koder relative to Theris A. Touhy United States Theris A. Touhy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
Theris A. Touhy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Koder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Koder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Koder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Koder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Koder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Koder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Koder. The network helps show where Deborah Koder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Koder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Koder Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Koder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199686
2 199841
3 201630
4 200825
5 201919
6 201619
7 200818
8 200616
9 201415
10 200815
11 199814
12 200611
13 199810
14 20189
15 20169
16 20208
17 19978
18 20087
19 20213
20 19963

About Deborah Koder

Deborah Koder is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 379 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (14 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (4 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Health and Well-being Studies (3 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (117 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (140 citations), Health (37 citations), General Health Professions (100 citations) and Demography (44 citations). Deborah Koder has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Edward Helmes, Henry Brodaty, Kaarin J. Anstey, Tanya E. Davison, Susan J. Ferguson, Nancy A. Pachana, Sunil Bhar, Colleen Doyle, Yvonne Wells and Leander K. Mitchell. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Psychologist, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, International Psychogeriatrics, Aging & Mental Health and Australasian Journal on Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact