Deborah Denman

13 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Deborah Denman
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Speech and Hearing 123
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 55
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 71
  • General Health Professions 49
Replace Jae‐Hyun Kim with:
Jae‐Hyun Kim Australia
Christina R. Studts United States
Linda Siktberg United States
Gulnur Freeman United States
Sasja A. Schepers Netherlands
Sarah A. Sobotka United States
Johannes Carl Germany
David V. Wagner United States
Edward Coffield United States
Sabine Manificat France
Deborah Denman relative to Jae‐Hyun Kim Australia Jae‐Hyun Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Jae‐Hyun Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Denman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Denman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Denman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Denman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Denman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Denman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Denman. The network helps show where Deborah Denman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Denman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Denman Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Denman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2017151
2 2017103
3 201764
4 201730
5 202120
6 201820
7 201919
8 202110
9 20228
10 20215
11 20232
12 20242
13 20201
14 20230

About Deborah Denman

Deborah Denman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Surgery and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dysphagia Assessment and Management (4 papers), Language Development and Disorders (4 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (3 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (3 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (3 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (123 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (81 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (55 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (71 citations) and General Health Professions (49 citations). Deborah Denman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Renée Speyer, Reinie Cordier, Jae‐Hyun Kim, Yu‐Wei Chen, Natalie Munro, Sarah Wilkes‐Gillan, Hans Bogaardt, Katina Swan, Berit Kertscher and Wendy M. Pearce. Their work appears in journals such as Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, Dysphagia, Journal of Clinical Medicine, International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Quality of Life Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact