Deborah Davis

107 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Deborah Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Social Psychology 812
  • Clinical Psychology 541
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 311
  • General Decision Sciences 34
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 213
Replace Alice S. Rossi with:
Alice S. Rossi Italy
Stephanie Brown United States
Elizabeth A. Martin United States
Catherine Martin United States
Peter O’Connor United Kingdom
Richard Charnigo United States
Amy L. Anderson United States
Jean Goodwin United States
Steven Shoptaw United States
Janice M. Brown United States
Deborah Davis relative to Alice S. Rossi Italy Alice S. Rossi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Alice S. Rossi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Davis. The network helps show where Deborah Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Davis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Davis Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Davis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 122 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003284
2 2004247
3 2006154
4 2004147
5 1998136
6 2012134
7 1995101
8 200694
9 201086
10 200684
11 197975
12 198172
13 200367
14 199858
15 199355
16 200754
17
Neonatal subgaleal hemorrhage: diagnosis and management.
200153
18 200050
19 200649
20 201249

About Deborah Davis

Deborah Davis is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 122 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (17 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (9 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (8 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (8 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (7 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (6 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (812 citations), Clinical Psychology (541 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (311 citations), General Decision Sciences (34 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (213 citations). Deborah Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Michael Vernon, Phillip R. Shaver, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Charlotte Ringsted, William C. Follette, William T. Perkowitz, Bruce L. Rogers, Scott A. Siegel, Kim Lewis and Kendra Beitz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Pediatric Research, Agronomy Journal, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and The Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact