Deb Smith
Impact in
-
- Global Health Workforce Issues
-
- Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Papers in
-
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 1
-
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 3
- Co-authors
- Nina Yssel (1 shared paper)Gabriel P. Haas (1 shared paper)Frances J. Kelley (1 shared paper)Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans (4 shared papers)David Osborn (4 shared papers)Vanessa Pinfold (4 shared papers)Kathleen Wilson (1 shared paper)Stephen S. Johnston (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (3 papers)British Journal of General Practice (2 papers)BJPsych Open (2 papers)BMC Psychiatry (1 paper)Nursing Administration Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Deb Smith
25 papers receiving 149 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Emergency Medical Services 21
- Urology 12
- Health 13
- Psychiatry and Mental health 16
- Clinical Psychology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Deb Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Deb Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deb Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deb Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deb Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deb Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deb Smith. The network helps show where Deb Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deb Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 34 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2024 | 2 |
About Deb Smith
Deb Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 157 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychiatric care and mental health services (3 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (1 paper), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (1 paper) and Gender Roles and Identity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (21 citations), Urology (12 citations), Health (13 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (16 citations) and Clinical Psychology (23 citations). Deb Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Nina Yssel, Gabriel P. Haas, Frances J. Kelley, Brynmor Lloyd‐Evans, David Osborn, Vanessa Pinfold, Kathleen Wilson, Stephen S. Johnston, Bette Keltner and Stan Bukofzer. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, British Journal of General Practice, BJPsych Open, BMC Psychiatry and Nursing Administration Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.