De Smith

664 citations
5 papers · 564 · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

De Smith

5 papers receiving 548 citations

De Smith's Hit Papers

Hippocampal and Amygdala Volumes According to Psychosis Stage and Diagnosis 2006 · 519 citations
5190+6+13Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

De Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 319
  • Biological Psychiatry 51
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 178
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 29
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 25
Replace Radovan Přikryl with:
Radovan Přikryl Czechia
Birgit Guse Germany
Mike F. Glabus United Kingdom
David M. Censits United States
Yvonne Czechowska Canada
Zhiyang Yin China
Christian Clemm von Hohenberg Germany
Adith Mohan Australia
C. Haag Germany
Sarina J. Iwabuchi United Kingdom
De Smith relative to Radovan Přikryl Czechia Radovan Přikryl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Radovan Přikryl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by De Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of De Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by De Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites De Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by De Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by De Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by De Smith. The network helps show where De Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside De Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with De Smith Line = papers co-authored together De Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1
Hippocampal and Amygdala Volumes According to Psychosis Stage and Diagnosis
Hit paper breakdown →
2006519
2 198923
3 198914
4 20084
5
Distance and path - The development, interpretation and application of distance measurement in mapping and spatial modelling
20044

About De Smith

De Smith is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 5 papers that have together received 564 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (1 paper), Schizophrenia research and treatment (1 paper), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper), Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper) and Geographic Information Systems Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (319 citations), Biological Psychiatry (51 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (178 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (29 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (25 citations). De Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dennis Velakoulis, Alison R. Yung, Patricia Desmond, Lisa Phillips, Patrick D. McGorry, Michael T. H. Wong, Warrick J. Brewer, Christos Pantelis, Tina Proffitt and Stephen J. Wood. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Anaesthesia, HIV Medicine and Archives of General Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact