Dawn Carnes
Impact in
- Conservation top 0.5%
- Art Therapy and Mental Health
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Papers in
- Pharmacology 19
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 19
-
- Clinical practice guidelines implementation 8
- Co-authors
- Martin Underwood (31 shared papers)Tamar Pincus (12 shared papers)Stephanie Taylor (14 shared papers)Brenda Mullinger (4 shared papers)Anisur Rahman (9 shared papers)Robert Froud (6 shared papers)Kate Homer (9 shared papers)Deborah Ashby (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ Open (12 papers)Trials (3 papers)Primary Health Care Research & Development (3 papers)Health Technology Assessment (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Dawn Carnes
65 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Conservation 168
- Pharmacology 572
- Occupational Therapy 95
- Medical Terminology 5
- Psychiatry and Mental health 259
Countries citing papers authored by Dawn Carnes
This map shows the geographic impact of Dawn Carnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dawn Carnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dawn Carnes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dawn Carnes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dawn Carnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dawn Carnes. The network helps show where Dawn Carnes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dawn Carnes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 196 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 149 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 129 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 117 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 112 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 110 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 90 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 82 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 81 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 64 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 45 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 45 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 44 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 41 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 34 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 32 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 30 |
About Dawn Carnes
Dawn Carnes is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacy, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (19 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (8 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (7 papers), Infant Health and Development (5 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (3 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (168 citations), Pharmacology (572 citations), Occupational Therapy (95 citations), Medical Terminology (5 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (259 citations). Dawn Carnes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Martin Underwood, Tamar Pincus, Stephanie Taylor, Brenda Mullinger, Anisur Rahman, Robert Froud, Kate Homer, Deborah Ashby, Suzanne Parsons and Clare Miles. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, Trials, Primary Health Care Research & Development, Health Technology Assessment and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.