David Young

20 papers receiving 715 citations

Peers

David Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 356
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 240
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 95
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 152
  • Occupational Therapy 46
Replace T. Nettelbeck with:
T. Nettelbeck Australia
Alison Jackson United Kingdom
Nuala Bent United Kingdom
Ursula Kirk United States
Stephanie Hart United States
Georgia A. DeGangi United States
Liam Dorris United Kingdom
Joseph M. Byrne Canada
Anna Caroline Leite Costa Brazil
Heidi Syväoja Finland
David Young relative to T. Nettelbeck Australia T. Nettelbeck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
T. Nettelbeck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Young. The network helps show where David Young may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Young, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Young Line = papers co-authored together David Young links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988211
2 2005134
3 200696
4 201747
5 199144
6 198842
7 201137
8 199024
9
A double-blind trial of protriptyline in the treatment of sleep apnea syndrome.
198824
10 201717
11 198916
12 201613
13 201711
14 201610
15 20167
16 20155
17 20043
18 20202
19 20231
20 20051

About David Young

David Young is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 746 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (2 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (356 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (240 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (95 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (152 citations) and Occupational Therapy (46 citations). David Young has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Frank Zorick, Thomas Roth, Timothy Roehrs, Edward J. Stepanski, Giulio E. Lancioni, Alonzo Andrews, Chaturi Edrisinha, Helen Cannella, Jeff Sigafoos and Mark F. O’Reilly. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, Journal of Behavioral Education, General Hospital Psychiatry, OJIN The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing and Journal of neurosurgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact