David Windridge

2.1k citations
124 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

David Windridge

116 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

David Windridge
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Signal Processing 237
  • Human-Computer Interaction 137
  • Health Informatics 43
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 429
  • Artificial Intelligence 324
Replace Ngan Le with:
Ngan Le United States
Yong Man Ro South Korea
Eric Sung Singapore
Kai‐Lung Hua Taiwan
Urs Müller United States
Jing-Ming Guo Taiwan
Gunther Heidemann Germany
Rolf P. Würtz Germany
Faustino J. Gomez Switzerland
Juhan Nam South Korea
David Windridge relative to Ngan Le United States Ngan Le's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Ngan Le · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Windridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Windridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Windridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Windridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Windridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Windridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Windridge. The network helps show where David Windridge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Windridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Windridge Line = papers co-authored together David Windridge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 124 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015201
2 2004126
3 2021104
4 201463
5 202053
6 201152
7 199848
8 202145
9 201641
10 201340
11 201135
12 201534
13 201531
14 201831
15 201227
16 201826
17 201925
18 201424
19 201724
20 201922

About David Windridge

David Windridge is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Health Information Management, having authored 124 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Machine Learning and Data Classification (14 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (11 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (9 papers), Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience (7 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (7 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (7 papers), Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications (6 papers) and Machine Learning and ELM (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Signal Processing (237 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (137 citations), Health Informatics (43 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (429 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (324 citations). David Windridge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Josef Kittler, Santosh Tirunagari, Norman Poh, Anthony T. S. Ho, Aamo Iorliam, Richard Bowden, William J. Christmas, Seyed Ali Ghorashi, Jean‐Yves Guillemaut and Reza Shahbazian. Their work appears in journals such as Lecture notes in computer science, Image and Vision Computing, Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE and Pattern Recognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact