Magda Osman

3.9k citations
131 papers · 2.4k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Magda Osman

121 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Magda Osman
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • General Decision Sciences 451
  • Applied Psychology 237
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 611
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 316
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 266
Replace Joseph G. Johnson with:
Joseph G. Johnson United States
Edward T. Cokely United States
Andreas Mojzisch Germany
Karl Halvor Teigen Norway
Loran F. Nordgren United States
Thorsten Pachur Germany
Michael Schulte‐Mecklenbeck Switzerland
Gideon Keren Netherlands
Willem A. Wagenaar Netherlands
Peter Juslin Sweden
Magda Osman relative to Joseph G. Johnson United States Joseph G. Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Joseph G. Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Magda Osman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Magda Osman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Magda Osman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Magda Osman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Magda Osman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Magda Osman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Magda Osman. The network helps show where Magda Osman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Magda Osman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Magda Osman Line = papers co-authored together Magda Osman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 131 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004284
2 2010163
3 2011122
4 201593
5 201677
6 201777
7 201960
8 201860
9 202350
10 201550
11 202047
12 200546
13 200646
14 200745
15 201044
16 201343
17 200539
18 201636
19 201336
20 200830

About Magda Osman

Magda Osman is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Artificial Intelligence, General Decision Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 131 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (26 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (17 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (14 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (13 papers), Risk Perception and Management (12 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (451 citations), Applied Psychology (237 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (611 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (316 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (266 citations). Magda Osman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wim De Neys, Sofie Cromheeke, Björn Meder, Natalie Gold, Phanish Puranam, Madan M. Pillutla, Nils Stieglitz, Richard Ashcroft, Cecilia Heyes and Miguel A. Vadillo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Risk Research, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology and Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact